23 April 2005 @ 01:14 am
Issues in Style: Sentence Length & Format [4/14/2002]  
Issues in Style: Sentence Length & Format
Originally written 4/14/02

A number of small tricks in the construction of a story's narrative can be employed by an author in order to convey tone and mood. Typically these are transparent to a reader -- and should be transparent. In my own opinion, stylistic tricks should always serve the story, not dominate it. When a story becomes just the vehicle for a display of authorial narrative brilliance, then it descends into chilly tedium. It lacks heart, and a story without heart fails to make a reader care.

Now, that opinion obviously reveals a lot about my own priorities and preferences as a novelist. But regardless of the relative importance of word-smithy to an author, all authors need to have some awareness not only of what one says (the characters, plot, etc.), but of how one says it (the style). Two different writers can describe the same series of events, but in the hands of one, it's pedantic and dull, while the other turns it riveting. That's mastery of the how, not the what.

And to some degree, those things can be learned. While I don't discount 'talent' in writing, a lot of it really is time, experience, attention to detail, and plain practice.

Let me take one of those matters of style -- sentence structure -- and examine how it impacts the way a narrative is read and received.

1) Shorter sentences work better for action, and for powerful emotional impact. Longer sentences work better for introspection. Why? Shorter sentences require less thought to process, and move a story along. When poorly handled, longer sentences contribute to confusion, but even when well constructed, they still always require more thought on the part of the reader ... i.e., they're more intellectual. Thus, shorter sentences sweep a reader along. Shorter sentences also have greater emotional impact. If you want to punch someone in the metaphorical gut, go for short. "Jesus wept," not "Jesus threw himself on the ground, kicking and screaming." (N.B., by long sentences, I mean those with multiple clauses and which take up several lines of printed text.)

2) To keep shorter sentences from sounding repetitive, vary the sentence structure. Alternate the placement of the subject, verb, and predicate. Don't forget the use gerunds and dependent clauses, too (but be sure your dependent clause modifies what it's supposed to modify). One can also use "and" and "but" at the beginnings of sentences, but beware of overuse. (One should vary sentence structure in any case, not just for the short sentences.)

3) Avoid dividing a sentence with a dependent clause unless one wants that choppy, discursive feel. Compare, "A quiet girl by nature, Elizabeth preferred tables in corners and sitting at the back of the class," with, "Elizabeth, a quiet girl by nature, preferred ...." The first is easier to follow. But sometimes one may want the discursive feel of the second. Just be aware that each of those choices lends a certain tone to the work. And if a paragraph feels awkward or convoluted, check the sentence format. A little rearranging may take care of the problem.

4) Don't mistake a long sentence for a run on sentence, and use good punctuation in those long sentences. The em-dash (--) is a wonderful thing, but don't overuse it. They're like italics. Too many em-dashes in a narrative acts like a sledgehammer. Also, beware of the overuse of commas. Now, my own style tends to minimize commas anyway and work with shorter sentences, but too many commas in a sentence will contribute to a choppy feel.

5) A hint: if you're writing an action scene, the use of verb + verbal infinitive is more effective than verb -and- verb. That is: "He GOT in the car TO GO to the store." Not, "He GOT in the care AND WENT to the store."

6) Choose the RIGHT verb or noun instead of modifying them with adjectives and -ly adverbs: pick 'raced' or 'sped' instead of 'ran quickly.' First, remember that shorter sentences have more emotional power, and chopping off extraneous adjectives and adverbs by picking the best noun or verb makes one's sentences shorter. Second, adjectives and adverbs are qualifiers and WEAKEN the noun or verb they modify. One does not have to use fancy 25-cent words that no one knows to get the right noun or verb. Just buy a thesaurus and use it. Let's take "run quickly." We already mentioned 'raced,' and 'sped,' but any of these would also do: careen, dart, dash, fly, hurry, hustle, rush, scamper, scurry, tear off ... And I limited myself only to words that are 7 letters or under and fairly common. Each of those words has more of a flavor (connotation) than the plain "run," or even "run quickly." VIVID language is what makes writing live.

7) Don't overuse incomplete sentences. That's something of a personal preference, but really -- it's annoying. Save it for effect. If overused, it's no longer effect. It's also often CONFUSING. I know some very good writers (including published writers) who use it a lot, but I think their overall narrative suffers, as a result. They'd be even better (imo) if they DIDN'T use it so much.

----

These are just some things I've picked up on, over time. I'm sure there are others I'm not thinking of, at the moment. Please also be aware that the overall style in which one writes will also influence one's sentence length. Even so, I think the above tips still stand in helping an author achieve the feel and flow that he or she is seeking.
Tags: ,
 
 
( Post a new comment )
Vagabond Sal: scribe - Petros[info]vagabondsal on April 23rd, 2005 12:10 am (UTC)
Adding this to my memories, as this is exactly the sort of thing I was talking about in my journal the other day. *G*
Minisinoo: pen (Jeff)[info]minisinoo on April 23rd, 2005 12:26 am (UTC)
Heh. Yup. It's funny how such small things really can have tremendous impact on how a narrative works, or how it's received.
LadyElaine[info]ladyelaine on April 23rd, 2005 05:57 am (UTC)
1) I'll disagree on the use of short sentences, or maybe I'm simply misunderstanding you. Short sentences are great for dramatic impact, but I hate using them for action scenes. The more periods there are in action, the more the action slows down, at least for me. I like to use a series of longer sentences, interspersed with the occasional short sentence for punch.

2) I also like to see variation in sentence structure, but not just in action scenes--it needs to be all the time. It's annoying as all get-out when I'm reading something where the author continually uses subject-verb sentences, especially when the subject is the same (he/she repetitiveness kills). A good author can use her sentence structure powerfully, creating a subtle rhythm that draws readers in.

4) And I'm terribly picky with commas in beta reading--but in writing, I'm the Comma Queen (and I also like hyphen breaks a little too much, as you can see!).

7) The other thing about sentence fragments is that only certain types actually work. Participle fragments should all die painful, screaming deaths, dammit!

Thanks! May I link to this in my LJ and on the site I frequent?
Minisinoo: blue eyes[info]minisinoo on April 23rd, 2005 10:43 am (UTC)
Regarding action scenes, the use of long, convoluted setences make them harder to follow, and thus, require the reader to think about it more, which slows reading down, rather than speeding it up.

Now, by long setences, I mean those with several clauses and spanning several printed lines of text. I don't mean a sentence with a single dependent clause, especially not one using a gerund formation. Those actually work rather well for action. Furthermore, it's possible to put the occasional longer sentence in an action scene. It's just that one doesn't want to load these scenes down with long sentences in the thought that a lack of periods helps the action move along. It actually slows action up since the brain has to process how the parts of the sentence relate. Also, IME teaching writing, long sentences in action scenes all too often wind up being run-on sentences (comma-splices and such).

And yes, definitely on the sentence structure being varied. I was speaking mostly to the previous admonition, but sentence structure should always have variation. I'll clarify that.

(laughing) about the participle fragments. Yup.

And sure, feel free to link it.
Blu[info]blufiction on April 23rd, 2005 07:02 am (UTC)
On point 3. This is something I am occassionally given flack for. By nature, I tend to write, and speak, discursively. I don't know why, perhaps the way I was taught English, or perhaps indicative of the way I think through things in my mind. Since *I* don't tend to view it the same way others do, I, for a long time, did not see anything wrong with it. And like you say, to a point, there is not. But it can get very confusing for readers not accustomed to a "round-about" way of deciphering sentences. :)
Minisinoo: lifeline S/J (Meridian)[info]minisinoo on April 23rd, 2005 10:48 am (UTC)
But it can get very confusing for readers not accustomed to a "round-about" way of deciphering sentences.

Yup, exactly. And to some degree, there's not a problem with it, since it is a point of personal style. In general, discursive structure is more often found in British style writing, and New England/New York/Eastern American. So it really is a matter of writing school. But the use of too much of it winds up slowing down the narrative and can contribute to a sense of confusion in longer narrative passages.
Take This Waltz[info]allegraconbrio on April 24th, 2005 02:22 pm (UTC)
Excellent post - thank you. I am here by way of metafandom and adding this to memories. I tend to not analyze sentence structure when writing, it comes later when editing. Your points are all points that I tend to follow in an instinctive manner, but reading them in this form was an excellent reminder.
Minisinoo: crystal pen[info]minisinoo on April 24th, 2005 03:16 pm (UTC)
You're welcome! And I don't think most of us analyze what we're doing as we do it; that really is an editing thing. And for me, I think it helps to have things spelled out that I do instinctively, so that I'm more conscious of them.
Opera: Three[info]opera142 on April 24th, 2005 05:39 pm (UTC)
Thank you, thank you, thank you. Sentence structure (and the rhythm it creates or doesn't create) gives me no end of grief. This was very helpful.
Minisinoo: Dani aiming[info]minisinoo on April 24th, 2005 08:44 pm (UTC)
You're welcome, you're welcome, you're welcome. (GGG)

Glad it was useful, seriously.
Tasha: hero[info]tasha87 on April 26th, 2005 06:43 am (UTC)
Have you read "Eats Shoots and Leaves" by any chance?
This post kind of reminds me of the book. :)
Minisinoo: Dani aiming[info]minisinoo on April 26th, 2005 05:57 pm (UTC)
No, I've not actually read that, but I've read quotes from it and found it amusing. And useful, as well. :-)
Graceless[info]storyjunkie on April 26th, 2005 08:10 pm (UTC)
This is great advice. A lot of the writing "How To"'s just skip over the grammar in favor of fostering creativity. This helps fill in the blanks, thank you.

Do you mind if I add this to my memories?
Minisinoo: create[info]minisinoo on April 26th, 2005 09:51 pm (UTC)
Do you mind if I add this to my memories?

Not at all. Glad it was useful. :-D

And I'm a big believer in knowing how the building blocks actually work to create the arch. (G)